1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 262 A.D.2d
  5. 262 A.D.2d 34 (1999)
 

PEOPLE v. HAMILTON

262 A.D.2d 34 (1999)

690 N.Y.S.2d 436

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES HAMILTON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 3, 1999.

On the existing record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708). Defendant has not shown that he was prejudiced by his counsel's untimely filing of motions for severance of the robbery counts and suppression of physical evidence, because the record suggests that neither motion would have been successful.

We perceive no abuse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases