OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The respondent was served with a petition, dated July 13, 1998, which contains one charge of professional misconduct against him. The Special Referee sustained the charge after a hearing at which the respondent neither appeared nor communicated an excuse for his absence, despite having been served with proper notice. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.