ABERDEEN-SPRINGFIELD CANAL v. PEIPER

No. 23912.

982 P.2d 917 (1999)

133 Idaho 82

ABERDEEN-SPRINGFIELD CANAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. George PEIPER and Lavaudis Peiper, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, March 1999 Term.

Rehearing Denied August 18, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Jones & Associates, Boise, for appellants. Jim Jones argued.

Ling, Nielsen & Robinson, Rupert, for respondent. Brent C. Tingey argued.


SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from the district court's order granting summary judgment and entering foreclosure of assessment liens in favor of the Aberdeen-Spring-field Canal Company (ASCC), pursuant to Chapter 22, Title 42 of the Idaho Code. We affirm.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

In 1969, George and LaVaudis Peiper (the Peipers) purchased agricultural property in Bingham County. The Peiper...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases