Collins asserts in his propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his procedendo action. For the following reasons, Collins's assertion lacks merit.
As the court of appeals correctly held, Judge Pokorny had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law when he denied Collins's Crim.R. 33 motion for a new trial. State v. Girts (1997),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.