1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 190 F.3d
  5. 190 F.3d 1350 (1999)
 

PROCESS CONTROL CORP. v. HYDRECLAIM CORP.

Nos. 98-1082, 98-1277.

190 F.3d 1350 (1999)

PROCESS CONTROL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYDRECLAIM CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 25, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Deveau, Deveau, Colton & Marquis, Atlanta, Georgia, argued for the plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Harold L. Marquis and Ryan A. Schneider.

Bradley A. Slutsky, King & Spaulding, Atlanta, Georgia, argued for the defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Joseph R. Bankoff and Christian S. Genetski.

Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

Process Control Corporation ("Process Control") appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Docket No. 93-CV-2795, wherein the district court sustained the validity and enforceability of U.S. Patent No. 5,148,943 owned by HydReclaim Corporation ("HydReclaim"), and found that Process Control had willfully infringed certain claims of that patent. Because the district court erred in its construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases