1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 195 F.3d
  5. 195 F.3d 1113 (1999)
 

BATTISTA v. F.D.I.C.

No. 97-56747.

195 F.3d 1113 (1999)

Sandra Kay BATTISTA; Joan Renee Taylor; Douglas Fabbri; Laurie Lou Chandler; Sherry Leysen; Karen A. Marino; Patsy D. Thompson; Bobbie J. McNeil; Mary Marsicano; Shirley A. Van Buskirk; Erika Rivero; Robert B. Faternick; Donald J. Bruyn; Annette Hanson; Julie C. Mazo; Constandeanna Elenie Wright; Glenda C. Moberg; Pamela A. Fairchild; Rebecca L. Smith; Cathy Lynn Fulton-Maloney; Harold Richard Norbrothen; Deborah Jane Tafoya; Carmen Razo; Robert Edward Steele; David S. Gordon; Linda Susan Aubin; Gilbert Fonseca; Mary Kellogg; Lisa M. Kelsey; Laura Lilly; Carole Meyers; James W. Pilgrim; Sarah E. Rodriguez; Nancy L. Shipman; Shawn Alison Shoemaker; Donna Smith; Jackie Todd; Courtney Wight; Cheryl C. Zweber; Carol Ann Okon; Lois A. Marcus; James L. Lauritzen; Valerie A. Hussey; Roberta L. Facchina; Ina Hahn; Diane Jo Allen; Tracy A. Allen; Carol Dignard; Hasmik Keyribaryan; Cathy Kiaha; George Klasser; Evodio Medina; Violette Naaman; Kimberly Jo Oliva; Hasmik Pashaie; Susan J. Rossi; Maria Del Carmen Contreras; John U. Crandall, III; Jan M. Eisenbeisz; Kyle Lance Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, appointed receiver of Bank of Newport, a failed depository institution, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 2, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Toledano, Toledano & Wald, Irvine, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Roberta H. Clark, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee.

Before: BOOCHEVER, O'SCANNLAIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Sandra Kay Battista and other former employees (collectively "Battista" or "employees") of the Bank of Newport ("Bank") appeal an order of the district court that permitted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") to pay a judgment to the employees in receiver's certificates rather than in cash. The employees also appeal the district court's refusal to award prejudgment interest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases