1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 186 F.3d
  5. 186 F.3d 981 (1999)
 

DAWN EQUIP. CO. v. MICRO-TRAK SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 98-2010.

186 F.3d 981 (1999)

DAWN EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and James H. Bassett, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. MICRO-TRAK SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 4, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick M. Kinnally, Edward Foote (argued), Murphy, Hupp, Foote, Mielke & Kinnally, Aurora, IL, for Dawn Equipment Company and James H. Bassett.

Gregory E. Barrett, Schlueter, Ecklund, Olson, Barrett & Mayfield, Rockford, IL; Theodore R. Plunkett, Daniel W. McDonald (argued), Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, Minneapolis, MN, for Micro-Trak Systems, Incorporated.

Before COFFEY, ROVNER and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

This diversity case might have been avoided had the parties taken more pains with drafting the contract here in dispute. Dawn Equipment Company ("Dawn"), a Minnesota corporation, sold Micro-Trak Systems, Inc. ("Micro-Trak"), an Illinois corporation, a patent for a device called a "Harvestyield," an invention designed to measure the flow of grain through a combine while "on the go" or while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases