1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 177 F.3d
  5. 177 F.3d 968 (1999)
 

KARLIN TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. SURGICAL DYNAMICS, INC.

No. 97-1470.

177 F.3d 968 (1999)

KARLIN TECHNOLOGY, INC. and Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. SURGICAL DYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 16, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Thomas H. Jenkins, Dirk D. Thomas, and Jeff E. Schwartz.

Constance S. Huttner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was Paolo A. Ramundo. Of counsel on the brief was John C. Andres, Surgical Dynamics, Inc., of Norwalk, Connecticut.

Before RICH, CLEVENGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Karlin Technology, Inc. and Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., (collectively, Karlin) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Civil Action No. 95-CV-258, granting a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of claims 1, 3, and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,015,247 (the '247 patent) in favor of Surgical Dynamics, Inc. (SDI). Because the accused device meets each of the properly construed limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases