Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court properly denied suppression of the physical evidence and identification testimony. The evidence presented at the suppression hearing demonstrated that the police officer's stop of the defendant was supported by a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot (see, People v Hicks,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.