Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his certification as a sex offender by the sentencing court pursuant to Correction Law § 168-d (1) violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws, since he committed the subject offenses on or about February 13, 1995, and New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see, Correction Law § 168 et seq.) did not take effect until January 21, 1996...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.