MOTTS v. COHEN


264 A.D.2d 764 (1999)

695 N.Y.S.2d 384

JEANNE A. MOTTS, Respondent, v. ARNOLD D. COHEN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 20, 1999.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The requirement that a motion for renewal be based upon newly-discovered facts is a flexible one, and a court, in its discretion, may grant renewal upon facts known to the moving party at the time of the original motion (see, Oremland v Miller Minutemen Constr. Corp., 133 A.D.2d 816). Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not improvidently exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases