1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 708 So.2d
  5. 708 So.2d 159 (1998)
 

PATEL v. PATEL

1961121.

708 So.2d 159 (1998)

Chiman S. PATEL v. Bharat M. PATEL and Daksha B. Patel.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Michael Barrett and C. Robert Poore III of Barrett & Poore, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant.

Candice J. Shockley of Holliman, Shockley & Kelly, Pelham, for appellees.

COOK, Justice.

Chiman Patel appeals a judgment in favor of his nephew, Bharat Patel, and Bharat's wife, Daksha Patel, for $85,908 in compensatory damages and $225,000 in punitive damages on their claim that Chiman fraudulently misrepresented the profitability of a motel they purchased from him in 1993. We affirm.

Bharat and Daksha Patel immigrated from India. After living a while in Atlanta, they returned to India...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases