SOBEL v. VILL. OF SCARSDALE


255 A.D.2d 500 (1998)

680 N.Y.S.2d 173

David Sobel et al., Respondents, v. Village of Scarsdale, Defendant, and Pipelining Products, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 23, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment upon the appellant's default in answering (see, Mondrone v Lakeview Auto Sales & Serv., 170 A.D.2d 586). It was incumbent upon the appellant to show a reasonable excuse for the one-year delay in serving its answer (see, CPLR 3012 [d]; 5015...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases