FISHMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK


255 A.D.2d 485 (1998)

679 N.Y.S.2d 908

Micah Fishman, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Edward Fishman, et al., Appellants, v. City of New York et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 23, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A party seeking to restore a matter to the trial calendar after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 must show the existence of a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay, an intent not to abandon the matter, and lack of prejudice to the opposing party (see, Carco Group v Murphy, 233 A.D.2d 415; Bohlman v Lorenzen,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases