Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion to strike the respondents' answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 based upon the failure of the defendant James Clarence Junior to submit to an examination before trial. The plaintiffs did not dispute defense counsel's assertion that the parties had previously stipulated that such failure would result in James Clarence Junior being...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.