KNOX v. SPRAGUE


255 A.D.2d 428 (1998)

680 N.Y.S.2d 854

Raymond C. Knox, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. James T. Sprague, Defendant, and Jordan Berkman et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 16, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The complaint stated a cause of action against the appellants sounding in fraud with sufficient specificity so as to comply with CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Black v Chittenden, 69 N.Y.2d 665; Lanzi v Brooks, 43 N.Y.2d 778, 780; F.S. Intertrade Off. Prods. v Babina, 199...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases