KEMPCKE v. MONSANTO CO.

No. 97-1423.

132 F.3d 442 (1998)

Darrell KEMPCKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided January 6, 1998.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied February 9, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Charles Howard, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellant.

Kenneth R. Heineman, St. Louis, MO, argued (Ellen C. Wilcoxen, on the brief), for appellee.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied February 9, 1998.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

Monsanto Company fired Darrell Kempcke when he refused to return company documents that he believed reflected a pattern of age discrimination against himself and others. Kempcke now appeals the grant of summary judgment dismissing his age discrimination and retaliation claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, and the Missouri...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases