STRAHM v. STRAHM


255 A.D.2d 308 (1998)

679 N.Y.S.2d 342

George E. Strahm, Respondent, v. Pamela Strahm, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 2, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

When reviewing a custodial parent's proposed move to a new locale, the court's primary focus must be on the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727; Matter of Browner v Kenward, 87 N.Y.2d 727). We conclude that the Supreme Court correctly determined that the best interests of the child would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases