The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of defendant's participation in the sale, including evidence that he directed the undercover officer to the seller for the purchase of cocaine, remained in the area after the sale was consummated and received $14 out of the $15 proceeds of the sale from the seller. The jury was entitled to reject defendant's loan repayment explanation.
Defendant's contention that the court should have...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.