While the majority of plaintiffs' interrogatories and document demands are germane to the action and phrased so as to state intelligible questions and requests sufficiently narrow to permit responses, the numbers listed above are overly broad, unduly burdensome, irrelevant or vague, and are therefore struck, but do not necessitate vacating plaintiffs' interrogatories or document demands in their entirety, and defendant is directed to otherwise comply therewith (see
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ALBERT v. TIME WARNER CABLE
255 A.D.2d 248 (1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 499
Richard Albert et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Time Warner Cable, a Division of Time Warner Entertainment, L.P., Appellant-Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 24, 1998
November 24, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
