Defendant's claim that the undercover officer should not have been allowed to testify anonymously was not preserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the ruling was properly grounded upon concerns for the officer's safety and that defendant has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced thereby (People v Washington,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.