1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 255 A.D.2d
  5. 255 A.D.2d 148 (1998)
 

HUGHES v. S&S APPAREL CORP.

255 A.D.2d 148 (1998)

679 N.Y.S.2d 580

Belinda Hughes, Appellant, v. S&S Apparel Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 10, 1998

The motion to renew was properly denied in the absence of any explanation why the facts adduced in support thereof, purporting to show that defendants delayed the CPL 30.30 dismissal of the criminal prosecution they initiated against plaintiff, were not adduced on the first motion (see, Foley v Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 568). In any event, were we to review the entire record, we would find that plaintiff fails to demonstrate ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases