Even if the court, in these circumstances, should not have permitted expert testimony relating to the issue of defendant's intent to sell, such ruling was harmless because there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted him. Defendant was observed showing glassines to a woman who did not purchase them because she was interested in buying "works", and defendant possessed over 20 glassines of two different "brands" of heroin separately packaged, which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
