TARGET STORES v. LIRC

No. 97-1253.

217 Wis.2d 1 (1998)

576 N.W.2d 545

TARGET STORES, a division of Dayton Hudson Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant, v. LABOR & INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION and Mary Crivello, Respondents-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided January 8, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the petitioner-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John M. Loomis and Katherine L. Williams of Beck, Chaet, Loomis, Molony & Bamberger, S.C. of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the respondent-respondent, Labor and Industry Review Commission, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and David C. Rice, assistant attorney general.

On behalf of the respondent-respondent, Mary Crivello, the cause was submitted on the brief of Christe L. McKittrick of McKittrick Law Office of Evansville.

Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ.


VERGERONT, J.

Target Stores appeals from an order affirming the decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) that Target violated the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (WFEA) by unreasonably refusing to accommodate the handicap of Mary Crivello. Target contends that LIRC's finding that Target was in a position to know what accommodation Crivello needed is unsupported by substantial evidence and that LIRC erroneously interpreted § 111.34(1)(b), STATS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases