MACY v. BLATCHFORD

9407-04746; CA A93045.

961 P.2d 873 (1998)

154 Or. App. 313

Danita J. MACY and Lawrence B. Macy, Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. Douglas M. BLATCHFORD, M.D., Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and Phillip S. Alberts, M.D., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 10, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Renee G. Wenger, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With her on the briefs was Hibbard, Caldwell & Schultz.

Kathryn H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents-cross-appellants.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.


HASELTON, Judge.

Defendant Douglas Blatchford, M.D.,1 appeals from an order and an amended order setting aside a judgment for defendant and granting plaintiffs Danita and Lawrence Macy a new trial in a medical malpractice action. Plaintiffs2 conditionally cross-appeal from the original judgment, asserting that, in the event we set aside the new trial order as procedurally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases