1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 9 F.Supp.2d
  5. 9 F.Supp.2d 8 (1998)
 

CROSKEY v. U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL

CIV.A. 94-2756 SSH.

9 F.Supp.2d 8 (1998)

Lori M. CROSKEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 23, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori M. Croskey, Arlington, VA, for pro se.

Wyneva Johnson, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Attorney's Office, William E. Reukauf, Office of Special Counsel, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are plaintiff's motion for an in camera examination, defendant's opposition thereto, and plaintiff's reply. The Court also re-evaluates defendant's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, filed March 6, 1995, in light of the supplemental affidavit of William E. Reukauf.1 Upon consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases