ROCHESTER v. ROCHESTER

No. 18437.

961 P.2d 794 (1998)

125 N.M. 369

1998-NMCA-100

Louis Paul ROCHESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. June Elizabeth ROCHESTER, Respondent-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

June 11, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd O. Bates, Jr., Bates Law Firm, Las Cruces, for Appellant.

Jon A. Feder, Atkinson & Kelsey, P.A., Albuquerque, for Appellee.


OPINION

HARTZ, Chief Judge.

{1} Lump-sum child support to cover future child support obligations is unusual, if not rare, in New Mexico. This appeal illustrates why that should remain the case. We affirm the district court's ruling that Louis Paul Rochester (Father) is not entitled to any credit from June Elizabeth Rochester (Mother) for prepaid lump-sum child support despite the transfer of custody of their child (Child) from Mother to Father.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases