1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 960 P.2d
  5. 960 P.2d 634 (1998)
 

HULL v. ALBRECHT

No. CV-98-0238-SA.

960 P.2d 634 (1998)

192 Ariz. 34

Governor Jane Dee HULL, Intervenor/Petitioner, v. Hon. Rebecca A. ALBRECHT, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, and Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66, et al.; Lisa Graham Keegan, Superintendent of Public Instruction; State Board of Education; State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest, Gilbert Unified School District No. 41; Murphy Elementary School District No. 21; Phoenix Union High School District No. 210; John J. Hester; Duane Standage; William Emory Grimes; Karen G. Moore; Paradise Valley Unified School District No. 69; Pendergast Elementary School District No. 92; Madison Elementary School District No. 38; Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48; Phoenix Elementary School District No. 1, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

June 16, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fennemore Craig by Timothy Berg, Janice K. Procter-Murphy, Paul J. Mooney, Phoenix, for Intervenor/Petitioner Governor Jane Dee Hull.

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest by Timothy M. Hogan, David S. Baron, Jennifer B. Anderson, Phoenix, for Real Parties in Interest Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66, et al.

Grant Woods, Attorney General by Sydney K. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, for Real Parties in Interest Lisa Graham Keegan, Superintendent of Public Instruction; State Board of Education; State of Arizona.

Osborn Maledon, P.A. by Andrew D. Hurwitz, G. Murray Snow, Phoenix, for Intervening School Districts and Voters.

Thomas W. Pickrell and Helm & Kyle, Ltd. by John D. Helm, Roberta S. Livesay, Phoenix, for Amicus Curiae Arizona School Boards Association, Inc.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 The Governor of Arizona brought this petition for special action against the Roosevelt Elementary School District and other districts, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the State Board of Education, asking that this court (1) declare that the Students FIRST Act of 1998 complies with the state's constitutional obligation to fund a general and uniform school system; and (2) vacate the superior court's order prohibiting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases