HENRY v. THE COUNTY OF SHASTA

No. 95-16704.

137 F.3d 1372 (1998)

Rolland Richard HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE COUNTY OF SHASTA; State of California; Jim Pope, as Sheriff; A.C. Chaidez, Officer; and H. Smith, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 2, 1998.


ORDER

The opinion, which is reported at 132 F.3d 512 (9th Cir.1997), is amended as follows:

(1) At page 519, second full paragraph, the first sentence is amended to read: "In holding that the May and Burns declarations may be used to establish municipal liability although the events related therein occurred after the series of incidents that serves as the basis of Henry's claims, we reiterate our rule that post-event evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases