1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 141 F.3d
  5. 141 F.3d 1355 (1998)
 

MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE v. LUMMI INDIAN TRIBE

Nos. 96-35341, 96-35342.

141 F.3d 1355 (1998)

MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Squaxin Island; Nisqually Indian Tribe; Puyallup Tribe, Plaintiffs, v. LUMMI INDIAN TRIBE, Defendant-Appellant. MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Squaxin Island; Puyallup Tribe; Nisqually Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs, v. LUMMI INDIAN TRIBE, Defendant, v. SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 17, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry L. Johnsen and Daniel A. Raas, Raas, Johnsen & Stuen, Bellingham, WA; Allan E. Olson, Office of the Tribal Attorney, LaConner, WA, for defendants-appellants.

Gregory M. O'Leary, Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: FLETCHER and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.

SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:

This appeal brings before us two disputes, (1) between the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe ("Muckleshoot") and the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community ("Swinomish") and (2) between the Muckleshoot and the Lummi Indian Nation ("Lummi"), over the interpretation of a decree adjudicating Indian treaty fishing rights in Washington state in respect to salmon and defining the "usual and accustomed fishing places" of the parties to this appeal in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases