1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 156 F.3d
  5. 156 F.3d 1206 (1998)
 

MAS-HAMILTON GROUP v. LaGARD, INC.

Nos. 97-1530, 97-1546.

156 F.3d 1206 (1998)

MAS-HAMILTON GROUP, Plaintiff Cross-Appellant, v. LaGARD, INC., (now known as Masco Corporation) Defendant-Appellant, and Hi-Shear Technology Corporation, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 10, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Schmit, Frost & Jacobs LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for plaintiff cross-appellant.

Christopher Darrow, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, Los Angeles, California, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Michael D. Harris and Guy Porter Smith.

Before MICHEL, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Declaratory judgment defendant-appellant, La Gard, Inc. ("La Gard"), appeals the decision of the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky holding after a bench trial that United States Patent No. 5,307,656 (the "'656 patent") was not shown infringed by declaratory-plaintiff/cross-appellant Mas-Hamilton Group's ("Mas-Hamilton's") X-07 lock. See Mas-Hamilton v. La Gard, Inc., No. 94-349, slip op. at 74, 1997 WL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases