1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 152 F.3d
  5. 152 F.3d 1161 (1998)
 

IMAX CORP. v. CINEMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 96-16094.

152 F.3d 1161 (1998)

IMAX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CINEMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Neil Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 19, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Warren, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, California; Matthew D. Powers, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Menlo Park, California, for plaintiff-appellant.

William Sloan Coats, Howrey & Simon, Menlo Park, California, for defendants-appellees.

Before: SNEED, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Capitalism requires that both property rights and vigorous competition, each within the limits fixed by law, coexist. The tension between these two imperatives generates many disputes. This case is concerned with one such dispute.

In this case, Imax Corporation ("Imax") seeks to protect its interests in large format motion picture projectors, generally known as "rolling loop" projectors, with respect to which Imax acquired several patents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases