U.S. v. MAXWELL

Nos. 97-3196, 97-3482.

160 F.3d 1071 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo MAXWELL (97-3196); Alvin Cordell (97-3482), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur P. Anninos (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for Defendant-Appellant Maxwell.

Philip E. Pitzer (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for Defendant-Appellant Cordell.

William E. Hunt, Office of the U.S. Attorney (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: KENNEDY, WELLFORD, and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Alvin Cordell and Ricardo Maxwell appeal their convictions for drug offenses on several grounds. Cordell makes four arguments: (1) that the prosecutor violated his right to equal protection when he exercised a peremptory strike to exclude a single juror, who was the only remaining black member of the venire; (2) that the prosecutor impermissibly struck two other jurors, who were eighteen and twenty-one years old...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases