BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN v. RETIREMENT BD.


551 Pa. 605 (1998)

712 A.2d 741

BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN and Pottstown Police Pension Fund, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT BOARD a/k/a Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 19, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony C. Busillo, II, for Borough of Pottstown.

Joseph J. Schafle, Jr., Philadelphia, for Pottstown Police Pension Fund.

Letitia Ann Dyer, III, Harrisburg, for Pa. Mun. Retirement Bd.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.


OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice:

In this appeal, the Borough of Pottstown and the Pottstown Police Pension Fund challenge the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board's denial of their claim to "excess interest" upon their withdrawal from participation in the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System.

After participating for eleven years in the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System (the "PMRS") pursuant to Article

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases