1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 960 P.2d
  5. 960 P.2d 181 (1998)
 

BUTTERS v. HAUSER

No. 23628.

960 P.2d 181 (1998)

131 Idaho 498

Mary J. BUTTERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert G. HAUSER, Hauser & Associates, Thomas L. Spangler, Harry Dewitt and Loreca J. Stauber and Board of Latah County Commissioners, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Moscow, April 1998 Term.

June 18, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Bradbury, Lewiston, argued for appellant.

Wetzel & Fasnacht, Coeur d'Alene, for respondent Hauser & Hauser and Associates. Steven C. Wetzel argued.

Douglas W. Whitney, Moscow, argued for remaining respondents.

WALTERS, Justice.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Mary J. Butters filed an action for declaratory judgment to declare a Latah County zoning ordinance void. Butters also sought a writ of mandamus to abate the issuance of a conditional use permit because it was allegedly predicated on a void ordinance. After Robert Hauser and the Board of Latah County Commissioners (Board) filed motions for summary judgment, the district court held that Butters did not have standing to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases