1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 572 N.W.2d
  5. 572 N.W.2d 316 (1997)
 

STATE v. OCCHINO

No. C5-97-231.

572 N.W.2d 316 (1997)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Richard L. OCCHINO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 28, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Dinan, City Attorney, and Cary W. Schmies, Assistant City Attorney, Duluth, Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, St. Paul, for respondent.

Peter J. Nickitas, Superior, WI, for appellant.

Considered and decided by AMUNDSON, P.J., and HUSPENI and KALITOWSKI, JJ.

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellant Richard L. Occhino challenges his misdemeanor convictions for trespassing and obstructing legal process, arguing that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Occhino also challenges the district court's refusal to admit an exhibit. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 18, 1996, at approximately 1:30 p.m., appellant Richard L. Occhino went to the Duluth police records bureau and spoke...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases