KAVANAU v. SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BD.

Docket No. S051847.

16 Cal.4th 761 (1997)

EARL W. KAVANAU, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

August 26, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Earl W. Kavanau, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James S. Burling, R.S. Radford, Paul C. Mileck, Sherman L. Stacey, Kimball & Weiner and George Kimball as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Anthony A. Trendacosta, Ralph H. Goldsen, Doris Ganga, Karl M. Manheim, Hedges & Caldwell, David Pettit and Joan Mack for Defendant and Respondent.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney (San Francisco), Andrew W. Schwartz, Deputy City Attorney, Richards, Watson & Gershon and Rochelle Browne as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

CHIN, J.

In this case, we consider the inverse condemnation claim of Earl W. Kavanau, a property owner who prevailed in a prior action against the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Rent Board) on the ground that the rent control regulations of the City of Santa Monica (the City) violated his right to due process of law. The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's dismissal order, rejecting Kavanau's inverse condemnation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases