1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 117 F.3d
  5. 117 F.3d 519 (1997)
 

BRISENTINE v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.

No. 96-6866.

117 F.3d 519 (1997)

Clifford BRISENTINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 21, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Zach Higgs, Jr., John R. Campbell, Huntsville, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Paul D. Ramshaw, U.S. EEOC, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae EEOC.

John R. Carrigan, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.

CARNES, Circuit Judge:

Clifford Brisentine brought this lawsuit against Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation ("Stone & Webster") alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Stone & Webster, holding that Brisentine's statutory claims were subject to compulsory arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases