1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 302 N.J.
  5. 302 N.J. Super. 323 (1997)
 

MAIORINO v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.

302 N.J. Super. 323 (1997)

FERDINAND C. MAIORINO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, JAMES REED, RONALD MARTINO, AND JEROME A. SHERMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 25, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent J. Apruzzese argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents (Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys; Mr. Apruzzese, of counsel; Mr. Apruzzese, Sharon P. Margello, Richard C. Mariani, Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, and Daniel P. Murphy, on the brief).

Bruce P. McMoran argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Barry & McMoran, attorneys; Mr. McMoran, of counsel; Mr. McMoran, John J. Barry, Colleen D. Shiarella, and Carmen J. DiMaria, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr., and COBURN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Defendants Schering-Plough Corporation (Schering), James Reed (Reed), Ronald Martino (Martino), and Jerome A. Sherman (Sherman) appeal (1) from a judgment of the Law Division entered on a jury verdict that awarded plaintiff Ferdinand C. Maiorino (Maiorino) (a) compensatory damages in the total amount of $435,000, consisting of $180,000 for back pay, $200,000...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases