RIDLER v. MADSEN

No. C1-96-2564.

565 N.W.2d 38 (1997)

James B. RIDLER, Appellant, v. Vicki Rose MADSEN, Respondent, Renville County, Respondent, Lawrence Mahoney, et al., Respondents, John Doe, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 26, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilbur W. Fluegel, Wentzel & Fluegel, Minneapolis, James F. Lord, Miles W. Lord & Associates, Chanhassen, for Appellant.

Eric Bartsch, James Olson, Behrens, Rodenberg & O'Connor, New Ulm, for Respondent Vicki Rose Madsen.

Arvid Wendland, Wendland & Alm, Blue Earth, for Respondent Renville County.

Kevin F. Gray, Rajkowski Hansmeier Ltd., St. Cloud, for Respondents Lawrence Mahoney, et al.

William A. Moeller, Mark S. Ullery, Gislason, Dosland, Hunter & Malecki, P.L.L.P., New Ulm, for Respondent Steven Madsen.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and PETERSON and AMUNDSON, JJ.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this personal injury lawsuit involving a motor vehicle driven by respondent and owned jointly by respondent and her husband, the district court denied appellant's motion to add respondent's husband as a defendant. We affirm the court's decision that Minnesota's Safety Responsibility Act does not make respondent's husband liable for respondent's actions while driving the vehicle.

FACTS

Appellant James Ridler was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases