Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly refused to suppress a statement made by the defendant in the patrol car. The statement was spontaneous because it was not the result of any comment by the two police officers in the vehicle which could reasonably have been expected to provoke an inculpatory statement (see, People v Rivers,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.