1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 129 F.3d
  5. 129 F.3d 457 (1997)
 

U.S. v. PADILLA-PENA

Nos. 97-1297, 97-1299, 97-1313, 97-1316, 97-1320, 97-1321 and 97-1323.

129 F.3d 457 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco PADILLA-PENA, aka Paco, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ana Rosa PADILLA-PENA, aka Ana, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto GUZZMAN, aka Beto, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis A. PADILLA-PENA, aka Ramone Pelone, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelica PADILLA-PENA, aka Leka, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael PADILLA-PENA, aka Miguel, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Artemio ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided November 6, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brent Michael Bloom, Omaha, NE, argued, for appellants Francisco Padilla-Pena in 97-1297 and Luis Padilla-Pena in 97-1316.

Bernard J. Monbouquette, Omaha, NE, argued, for appellant Michael Padilla-Pena in 97-1321.

Michael F. Gutowski, Omaha, NE, argued, for appellant Ana Rosa Padilla-Pena in 97-1299.

Gregory William Plank, Bellevue, NE, argued, for appellant Roberto Guzzman in 97-1313.

Karen L. Vervaecke, Omaha, NE, argued, for appellant Angelica Padilla-Pena in 97-1320.

Mark Wesley Bubak, Omaha, NE, argued, for appellant Artemio Esparza in 97-1323.

Ellyn Grant, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Omaha, NE, argued, for appellee.

Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Luis Padilla-Pena, Francisco Padilla-Pena, Ana Rosa Padilla-Pena, Angelica Padilla-Pena, Roberto Guzzman, Michael Padilla-Pena, and Artemio Esparza appeal their convictions of conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1997), varying counts of possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1997), and the sentences imposed upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases