HYLAND v. WONDER

No. 95-15533.

117 F.3d 405 (1997)

Lanric HYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy L. WONDER, Supervising Judge, Juvenile Court, Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, individually and in his official capacity; Daniel M. Hanlon, Presiding Judge, Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, individually and in his official capacity; Dennis Sweeney, Chief Probation Officer, San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department, individually and in his official capacity; Fred Jordan, Chief Probation Officer, San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department, individually and in his official capacity; Stephen La Plante, Director, Juvenile Hall, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 25, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond D. Battocchi, Gabeler, Battocchi & Griggs, McLean, VA, for plaintiff-appellant Lanric Hyland.

G. Scott Emblidge, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Superior Court, Dennis Sweeney, Fred Jordan and Stephen La Plante.

Sharon S. Chandler, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees Roy L. Wonder and Daniel M. Hanlon.

Before SNEED, BOOCHEVER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.


BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.

Lanric Hyland, a former volunteer juvenile probation worker, appeals the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which alleged that government officials violated his First Amendment rights when they retaliated against him for his criticism of conditions and management at San Francisco's Juvenile Hall.

FACTS

The following facts are drawn from the parties' statement of undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases