PEOPLE v. ROLDAN


238 A.D.2d 255 (1997)

656 N.Y.S.2d 873

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Roldan, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 22, 1997


Defendant has failed to preserve his claims that the People should have sought an advance ruling on the admissibility of uncharged crime evidence, and that the court should have given the jury a sua sponte limiting instruction thereon, and we decline to review these claims in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find that there was no prejudice to defendant in these regards (see, People v Ramos, 220 A.D.2d 330

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases