The trial court properly modified its original Sandoval ruling. Defendant's direct testimony at trial that he was "just" a drug user was misleading under the circumstances, and conveyed the impression that he was not a seller, thereby opening the door to inquiry into his prior conviction for an attempted sale (see, People v Santiago,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.