1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 238 A.D.2d
  5. 238 A.D.2d 221 (1997)
 

CLASSIC OFFICE SUPPLIES, INC. v. CLASSIC COMMERCIAL OFFICE PRODS., INC.

238 A.D.2d 221 (1997)

657 N.Y.S.2d 7

Classic Office Supplies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Classic Commercial Office Products, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Stanley Adler, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Classic Office Supplies, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants, and Norma Weisenfeld, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 22, 1997

The subject contract was properly rescinded due to a material misrepresentation of fact upon which respondent relied (see, Bloomquist v Farson, 222 N.Y. 375, 380). Further, as the misrepresentation was intentionally made by the corporate seller's sole officer, director and shareholder, the court properly pierced the corporate veil and imposed the corporate obligation upon appellant (see, Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases