Respondent's determination is supported by substantial evidence that it is commonplace for universities to own and operate radio stations many of which operate at or near the same power level of the proposed radio station, and is rationally based on a statute that specifically lists radio towers as an accessory use (NY City Zoning Resolution § 12-10 [b], [q]). Accordingly, the determination was properly confirmed (see, Matter of Toys "R" Us v Silva,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN v. BD. OF STANDARDS & APPEALS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
238 A.D.2d 200 (1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 242
In the Matter of New York Botanical Garden, Appellant, v. Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondent. Fordham University, Intervenor-Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 15, 1997
April 15, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.