Summary judgment was properly granted based upon uncontroverted evidence that defendants did not act with constitutional malice. Defendant Newfield's reliance on a transcript of Dr. Shabazz's interview, three published biographies and a documentary film on Malcolm X, the affidavit of a confessed and convicted assassin, an interview he conducted with a former close aide of Malcolm X, and the published writings and speeches of plaintiff Farrakhan conclusively demonstrates that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
