WINTERBERG v. LUPO


300 N.J. Super. 125 (1997)

JOAN M. WINTERBERG (FORMERLY JOAN M. LUPO), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAY LUPO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Crammond argued the cause for appellant (Podesta, Myers & Crammond, attorneys; Mr. Crammond, on the brief).

Sanford M. Kahan argued the cause for respondent (Simon & Enright, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Kahan, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR, Jr. and KLEINER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D.

Defendant, Jay Lupo, appeals from an order entered in the Family Part on March 11, 1996. Defendant contends that the motion judge erred in: (1) setting child support at $60 per week; (2) failing to apply the support order retroactively; (3) failing to order plaintiff to pay one-half of certain unreimbursed medical and dental expenses incurred by defendant on the children's behalf; and (4) failing to recognize...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases