Substantial evidence supports the charge made in specification number six, that petitioner, in filing documents with the ASPCA, used a false name, badge number and precinct, and lied concerning the origin of the dog he brought there to avoid a potential unpleasantness concerning the fellow officer who owned and cared for this precinct mascot. Even if one were favorably disposed toward petitioner in connection with the other charges, the critical fact remains that petitioner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
